Teams / Southern Gems / zeta Phoenicis and kappa Pavonis

zeta Phoenicis and kappa Pavonis


Hi allSince the second Citizen Sky workshop, I've been submitting observations (via http://www.citizensky.org/submitdata/visual) of Eta Aquliae, a star that is on both our list and the 10-star tutorial list. I'm getting hooked on visual variable star observing!I've started turning my attention to other stars on our list, in particular, zeta Phoenicis and kappa Pavonis for a couple of reasons:a. They are both nice and high in the sky from my Australian location right now.b. Neither of these stars has much data in the AAVSO International Database (AID). zet Phe has just 3 observations recorded in the AID, while kap Pav has about 70.zet Phe has a period of around 1.6698 (e.g. see VSX and our list). I wonder where the data is that was used to determine that? I haven't read much of this 1950 paper concerning zeta Phe yet: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?bibcode=19... its eclipsing binary nature and period having been determined by photometric means. It would be nice if that data was in AID. The great thing is that we have the opportunity to contribute data for this and kappa Pavonis where very little data exists currently!Sebastian, should I use your charts for these stars at the moment? http://varsao.com.ar/cartas_de_variables.htmWhenever the Southern Gems charts are ready I'm happy to test them on these stars. Is there any work still remaining to be done towards these or any of the charts?Regards,David

Zeta Phoenicis observation

I just submitted my first observation of Zeta Phoenicis via the AAVSO'sWebObspage. I used "Southern Gems" as the Chart ID. We will have to use that submission method until the Citizen Sky submission page lists the Southern Gems stars. The chart and comparison stars (I used 39 & 42 on this occasion with an estimate of mag 4.0) were clear and easy to use. Thanks Sebastian. I used unaided and binocular views, but found the latter to be easier from my at-times light-polluted suburban location. My binoculars fogged up just when I was about to attempt a Kappa Pavonis estimate, so I called it a night. Regards, David

Zeta Phe and kappa Pav

Hi,David, there is a long history of observations and papers for these stars and they are both very interesting. Zeta Phe is an eccentric system that shows apsidal motion caused by a third star orbiting the eclipsing pair. This causes min II to change in orbital phase with time if we use a fixed period for the primary eclipse (of course it's the orbital plane that changes its inclination with respect to our line of sight). So if we observe long enough we will see that effect taking place. The period of the third body is 221 years according to http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.3980

The current periods are determined with years and years of photometric data, althoguh that doesn't strictly mean that the catalogues are listing the most up to date values. We have alrady discussed that lCar and kap Pav undergo period changes and the current values are different from the catalogued ones!

Kappa Pav may change its period again any time soon. It has changed by as much as 40 min. in the past (extreme values) which is a lot for a cepheid variable. Continuous monitoring reveals that as phase shifts in the light curve when we use a fixed period to plot the observations.

So these two stars have something in common: if we use a fixed period for them we'll see that the light curve will show wandering datapoints if we wait enough years to see it. Yes, you can use those charts, the comparison stars will be basically the same but with the AAVSO format.

The charts are ready we are only waiting to finish the tutorial to make the final pdf. But it's better that we all use the same charts so I am attaching them here. Cheers,

Sebastian.

AttachmentSize
kap_Pav_Chart.gif 14.54 KB
zet_Phe_chart.gif 17.32 KB
Charts for zet Phe and kap Pav, and data...

Hi Sebastian Thanks for attaching the charts for the two stars. They are very clear! Thanks also for the paper reference and providing details of interesting aspects of zet Phe and kap Pav. Getting back on my hobby horse of "where's the data dude?", I wonder just how often data is obtained for particular studies but not contributed to the AAVSO International Database (AID)? Reading the zet Phe section in the paper you cited, we see:

"The unfiltered light curve was observed in 1950’s by Hogg (1951), after then by Dachs (1971) in UBV filters, and the best one by Clausen et al. (1976) in ubvy filters."

and

"Our new photoelectric U BV observations were secured with the modular photometer utilizing Hamamatsu EA1516 photomultiplier on the 0.5-m telescope at the Sutherland site of the South African Astronomical Observatory (SAAO) during two weeks in September 2005."

These comments point to (at least) 4 photometric data collection efforts. But where is the data for these? Sitting on individual researcher or research institution's hard drives (or tapes/cards for the older data)? Do you think this happens often, rather than such data being submitted to AID? This has two obvious negative consequences: 1. How can the results of such papers be checked (i.e. how can the "experiments" be repeated)? I'm sure the authors would share their data if requested though. 2. The data is not available for posterity, analysis of change over time etc. I realise this is outside of the scope of Southern Gems, but it seems like an interesting question to me. It's cloudy at the moment, so no estimates tonight... Regards, David

Southern Gems

Wiki pages

My Teams

Not a member of any groups.

Powered by Drupal